Another Place to Download Clean Copy of the New Regional Sales Contract
---------------------------------------------------
Click Here To Receive Updates by E-mail
Disclaimer
The first Weblog (Blog) originally devoted to articles and discussion of the New Regional Sales Contract to be released by various associations of Realtors in the Washington D.C. Metropolitan area on September 15th, 2006. Now we can discuss the NEW NEW contract to be released January 1, 2012 This is a personal project of Marcus Simon. Please see the Disclaimer published June 25, 2006.
Don't be confused by what some members of the Regional Sales Contract Task Force might be teaching about the rules governing Delivery of addenda and notices. Keep in mind, the Delivery paragraph is in the Virginia Jurisdictional Addendum, which the task force had no role in writing.
The first sentence of the first paragraph of the Virginia Jurisdictional Addendum reads:
"Delivery methods may include hand-carried, sent by professional courier service, by United States Mail, by facsimile or by e-mail transmission. "
It is still perfectly acceptable to deliver things by FAX, provided that the buyer or seller, as the case may be, has provided you with a Fax number in paragraph 1B of the Va. Jurisdictional Addendum.
What seems to have confused some of the folks on the Regional Sales Contract Task Force is that notices and addenda sent via FAX aren't deemed delivered for the purpose of calculating time periods, until the day they are acknowledged in writing by the recipient. All that we meant to accomplish with this requirement was to prevent unscrupulous buyers or sellers from faxing a notice to an empty office building on a Friday evening to start time periods running early.
If you want to continue to use fax this contract requires to you to take steps that most of us consider common courtesy -- call before faxing to make sure someone will be there to pick up your fax, call after faxing to make sure all of the pages went through without sticking together or before the fax machine ran out of paper, and then have them fax you back a note agreeing they receive the entire contents of your Fax.
The only time you need to resort to the use of a professional courier are those rare instances when the other party is refusing to hear what you have to say and won't send anything back to admit they have your fax.
This was posted via E-mail - sorry about the formatting.
---------------------------------------------------
Click Here To Receive Updates by E-mail
Disclaimer
*** DELIVERY (Paragraph 1 of the new Va. Jurisdictional Addendum) Methods may include hand-carried, sent by professional courier service, by United States mail, by facsimile or by email transmission. The purchaser does not actually need to receive the contemplated Notice or item for Delivery to take place. What matters is that the Seller uses the proper method and the proper address. If so, Delivery is deemed to have occurred.
CAUTION: Delivery by Fax, e-mail or any method not specified in this paragraph is only effective on the day it is acknowledged in writing by the recipient. Lost or misplaced faxes will NOT constitute delivery. Faxes that sit on the machine over the weekend aren’t Delivered until someone picks them up on Monday morning and faxes/e-mails/instant messages or otherwise provides written acknowledgement.
**** NOTICES. Defined as a unilateral communication from one party to another. Adds that a response or acknowledgement is a courtesy but is not required. This was moved to the Jurisdictional Addendum to allow Maryland and DC to have Days be defined as Business Days (M-F) or Business Days (M-Sat) or Calendar Days depending on the method of Delivery.
30. MISCELLANEOUS: UNCHANGED FROM 1999
31. VOID CONTRACT: UNCHANGED FROM 1999
32. ADDITIONS: Reordered the list in alphabetical order (except for Jurisdictional Addendum which is first). Deleted “No” check box for the Jurisdictional Addendum.
33. HOME WARRANTY: This is now its own paragraph, not just part of the ADDITIONS paragraph.
34. OTHER TERMS: More lines.
---------------------------------------------------
Click Here To Receive Updates by E-mail
Disclaimer
28. ASSIGNABILITY: UNCHANGED FROM 1999
I can also use this feature to send out urgent alerts when critical errors and fixes are discovered/implemented.
I have also added buttons for My Yahoo and Google feeds, so you can have the title and summaries of the post appear on your My Yahoo or Google home pages. I will be adding more syndication tools as I learn how to use them.
Haloscan commenting and trackback have been added to this blog. This allows you to leave comments and to see what other bloggers are linking here.
I hope you are finding this site useful. Please leave comments and or contact me using marcus@simon.net (for Blog related things) or msimon@mbh.com (for work related things).
Continuing a series that started with this post discussing the changes on Page 1, here is a highlighted copy of page two and a text explanation of what has changed.
4. DEPOSIT: Changed “has made a deposit with” to “has delivered a deposit to.” Added language limiting Escrow Agent liability to any party on account of disbursement or failure to disburse the Deposit, except in the event of the Escrow Agent’s gross negligence or willful misconduct.
5. DOWN PAYMENT: Changes “at Settlement” to “on or before the Settlement Date” and adds that an “Assignment of funds cannot be used without prior written consent of Seller.”
6. SETTLEMENT: Combines the old Settlement Agent Paragraph (old ¶19) with the SETTLEMENT paragraph (old ¶18). Specifies that each party can select their own “legal” counsel.
7. EQUIPMENT, MAINTENANCE AND CONDITION: The following sentence is added to remind the Seller once again not to turn off the utilities: “The Seller will have all utilities in service through Settlement or as otherwise agreed.” Adds language “except as otherwise provided” to Seller’s warranty that all items will be in normal working order.
8. UTILITIES